Sitting on a telecon to which I have no substantive contribution
and relatively limited information to be gleaned, my odd and seemingly
irrational inclination to take part in an activity such as distance
running is somehow validated. (emphasis on the "somehow")
I
suppose that the argument could be made that the very activity of
running is such that provides no substantive contribution and (in and of
itself) has relatively limited information to be gleaned.
I
would disagree, but am happy to entertain a substantive argument
against me; however I suspect that any such argument would provide
relatively limited information to be gleaned.
 |
| The best of both worlds? |
1 comment:
Dude, you make my head hurt.
Post a Comment